1 CGHC010161052005 2026:CGHC:39472 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 627 of 2005 1 - Smt.Geeta Bai wife of Dilharan resident of village Mopka P.S. Sarkanda, Tahsil and District Bilaspur. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant/s : None. For Respondent/State : Shri Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09/09/2026 1. None appears on behalf of the appellant even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 2. The appellant has challenged the order dated 13.7.2005 passed in Criminal Misc. Judicial Case No.60 of 2005 under the provisions of Section 449(ii) of the Cr.P.C., whereby the surety amount of Rs.7,000/- furnished by Smt. Geeta Bai was forfeited. 3. The facts, in brief, are that Sessions Trial No.399 of 2004 was pending before the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, against NIRMALA RAO 2 accused Manoj Verma. As his bail application was allowed, he was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs.7,000/- with one surety for the like sum. The appellant herein furnished surety for accused Manoj Verma. Between 25.2.2005 and 21.3.2005, accused Manoj Verma failed to appear before the learned trial Court. Consequently, his bail bonds were cancelled and the surety amount was forfeited vide order dated 13.7.2005. The said order has been challenged by filing the present appeal. 4. I have perused the record of MJC No.60 of 2005. 5. Having considered the fact that the surety bond furnished by the appellant herein was forfeited as accused Manoj Verma failed to appear before the learned trial Court, I do not find any illegality in the order passed by the learned Court below. Further, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 6. Having considered the facts discussed above, this appeal fails and is hereby dismissed. sD/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi