Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14384 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Heard Sri Janardan Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ghanshyam Mishra, learned Brief Holder for the State-respondent. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 71 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 319, 335, 336(3), 338, 340 BNS, Police Station Nizamabad, District Azamgarh, during pendency of the trial in the court below. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that, however, as per allegation, applicant was a national of Malaysia but in spite of that on the basis of forged documents, he also became a voter in India but entire allegations made against the applicant are totally false. 4. He further submitted that actually family of applicant resided in India and his son due to mistake added his name in the voter list of India which during CSIR has been removed. 5. He further submitted that applicant has no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since March, 2026. 6. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the arguments on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 8. However, as per allegation, applicant was a national of Malaysia but in spite of that his name was in the voter list of India but it reflects now his name from the Indian voter list has been removed. 9. Further, applicant has no criminal history and he is in jail in the present matter since March, 2026. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Janardan Yadav, Manikant Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd Quddus Alias Quddus .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
10. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, discussed above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 11. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 12.
Let the applicant-Mohd Quddus Alias Quddus, be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 13. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 14. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. May 6, 2026 Ankita BAIL No. 14384 of 2026 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANKITA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad