JAMADAR MAHTO and ORS v. RAM AYODHYA MAHTO and ORS
SA/179/1994 · 2026-02-16
Khatim Reza
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35087 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35087 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA SECOND APPEAL No.179 of 1994 ====================================================== Jamadar Mahto and Ors ... ... Appellant/s Versus Ram Ayodhya Mahto and Ors ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Khare, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 23 16-02-2026 Since the suit is for partition and the appeal has already been abated for non-filing of substitution petition with regard to respondent nos. 2(iii) and 2(iv), the appeal is incompetent.
2. Consequently, the whole appeal is abated.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
prabhat/- (Khatim Reza, J) U