CRP No. 1603 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRP No. 1603 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 7548 OF 2026 1. Sugumar S/o. Late. Raji, No.63, Palanidiswarar Koil St, Mangadu, Chennai 112. 2. Gajendran S/o. late. Raji, No.63, Palanidiswarar Koil St, Mangadu, Chennai 112. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. T. Rajendran S/o. M.K. Thirunavukarasu, O.No.B4, N.No.60, Veelleeshwaran Kovil St, Mangadu, Chennai 22. 2.Vijaya D/o. late. Raji, Plot No.16, Shea Kelar Nagar, Jeganathapuram, Kundarhur, Chennai 069. 3.Chandra D/o Late. Raji, No.2, Thulasi Mudali St, Perambur, Chennai 011. 4.Kalaiarasi D/o. Late. Raji, No.2, Ramar Kovil St, Nanciambakkam, Chennai 089. 5.Mala D/o. Late. Raji, No.10, Pillayar Kovil St, Siruvanur Village, Tiruvallur Taluk, Tiruvallur 631 203. 6.The Sub Registrar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1603 of 2026 Kundrathur Sub Registrar Office, Sammandam Nagar Main Road, Kundrathur, Chennai 069. Respondent(s) CRP No. 1603 of 2026 PRAYER To strike off the entire proceedings in OS No.235 of 2024 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court at Sriperumbudur. CRP No. 1603 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): MR.BHARATHI RAJA FOR M/S.Nathan and Associates For Respondent(s): ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed this Civil Revision Petition to strike off the entire proceedings in OS No.235 of 2024 on the file of the learned District Munsif Court at Sriperumbudur, on the ground that the petitioners are absolute owner of the suit property in which the plaintiff has no right and title. In fact, the 1st respondent’s father filed the suit in OS No. 1041 of 2008 on the file of District Munsif Court, Sriperumbudur, for claiming adverse possession the same property and the said suit was dismissed. Now, 1st respondent filed the present suit as it vexatious. Hence, he prays to strike off the plaint. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1603 of 2026 2. On perusal of grounds raised by the petitioners, the petitioners raised allegation that respondent’s have no right over the suit property as well as claiming that the petitioners have been in long uninterrupted possession of the suit property. If so, the petitioners’ remedy is to strike off the plaint is available under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, without exhausting such remedy the petitioners is not entitled to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are entitled to file appropriate application before the Trial Court as per manner known to law. No Costs. Pending miscellaneous petition if any, is allowed. 21-04-2026 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1. The District Munsif Court at Sriperumbudur. 2. The Section officer, V. R Section, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 1603 of 2026 T.V.THAMILSELVI J. pbl CRP No. 1603 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 7548 OF 2026 21-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis