Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3508 (AP)

Syed Khaja, v. Union of India,

WP/16280/2026 · 2026-06-22

Ravi Nath Tilhari, Subhendu Samanta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation: _____________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading : 30.06.2026 APHC010276822026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3562] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 16280/2026 Between: 1. SYED KHAJA,, S/O LATE SYED MASTAN VALI, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 73-10-236, DARGA MANYAM 4TH LANE, NEAR RAMARAO STATUE, GUNTUR - 522003 ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD - 500025 2. THE SENIOR DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICER, SOUTH, CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. - 520001 3. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEER GOODS, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 520001 2 4. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 26.04.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the consequential rejection order dated 06.12.2010, and set aside the same, and consequently direct the respondents to consider my case for compassionate appointment in accordance with law IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to pass an interim order by direct the respondents to consider my case for compassionate appointment in accordance with law, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Dr SAYYED BABU SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 16280/2026 ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) Heard Sri Dr. Sayyed Babu Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Josyula Bhaskara Rao, learned Central Government Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The Petitioner’s claim for compassionate appointment was rejected by the authorities – the Divisional Railway Manager, Vijayawada on 10.06.2009. Challenging the said order the petitioner along with one more person filed OA.No.27 of 2011, which was dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad on 26.04.2012. The dismissal was on the ground that the petitioner was not covered under the scheme for appointment. 3 The present petition has been filed challenging the order of the Tribunal after almost Fourteen years of the said order. There is no explanation for such long delay. The laches have not been explained. 4. In the matter of compassionate appointment, the petitioner must approach without delay considering the nature of urgency if it is so. The Writ Petition has been filed belatedly, after about 14 years of the Tribunal’s order. The petition suffers from latches. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed. 4 No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA,J Dated:23.06.2026 AG Whether the Order is: Speaking  Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable  5 98 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 16280/2026 Dated:23.06.2026 AG