Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3507 (JHR)

SANDEEP KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/253/2022 · 2026-01-27

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1932 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 253 of 2022 ------ Sandeep Kumar Singh, aged about 38 years, S/o Jai Prakash Singh, R/o Village-Dwarikapuri, Road No.12, Chutia PO + PS- Chutia, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, having its office at Project Building, PO & PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Department of Personnel, Training and Rajbhasha, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at Project Building, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Secretary, Department of Transport, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at F.F.P. Building, PO & PS-Dhurwa, Dist- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Commissioner, Department of Transport, Govt. of Jharkhand having its office at F.F.P. Building, PO & PS- Dhurwa, Dist-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, AAG-III ------ 19/ 27th January, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order contained in Memo No.144 dated 27.12.2018, whereby the contract of the petitioner have been terminated who was engaged on contractual basis in the Transport Department, Govt. of Jharkhand. 3. It is the admitted case of the petitioner that he was appointed on contractual basis and he was not a permanent employee. The impugned order contained in Memo No.144 dated 27.12.2018, doesn’t remotely suggest that the order by which the contract of the petitioner has been cancelled is stigmatic in nature. When no stigma is attached to the order, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the same. 4. If in future a fresh advertisement is published for any appointment, it will be open to the petitioner to apply pursuant to 2026:JHHC:1932 2 the said advertisement and the aforesaid order of termination of contract will not come in the way of his appointment. 5. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 27.01.2026 S.K.D., cp2 Uploaded on 27.02.2026