S. No. 108 Suppl Cause List-1 IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CrlM(1833/2026) IN CRM(M) 804/2026 CrlM(1834/2026) SYED ARIF MEHRAJ …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ateeb Kanth, Advocate Vs. SAKIB AHMAD DAR ...Respondent(s) Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER 30.09.2026 1. It is fairly conceded by the counsel for the petitioner that as on today no cognizance has been taken against the petitioner and that in terms of Section 223 of the BNS, the petitioner has a right to contest the complaint before the cognizance is taken. 2. He therefore, submits that he would not press this petition being premature but with liberty to reserve the right of assailing the cognizance order in case need arise. His statement is taken on record. 3. Dismissed as not pressed along with connected CrlM(s) with liberty to file fresh in case need arise. (SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE Srinagar 30.09.2026 “Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 01.10.2026 09:45