Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35058 (CAL)

DIPAK SHIL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(M)/1004/2026 · 2026-08-17

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A.S./DL.05 17-08-2026 Ct. No.33 Saikat Mukherjee (Allowed) CRM(M)/1004/2026 DIPAK SHIL VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL In Re: Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed in connection with Gangnapur P.S. Case No.355/2024 dated 01.11.2024 under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/ 118(2)/109/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das, Adv. Mr. Dipendu Sarkar, Adv. …For the Petitioner Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Sr. Govt. Adv. Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay, Adv. …For the State 1. Heard learned advocates representing the parties. 2. Learned advocate representing the petitioner submitted the trial in connection with Gangnapur Police Station case no.355 of 2024 has commenced. The petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2024, that is, the date of the alleged incident of assault. It was further submitted that the petitioner was devoid of any antecedent and had been falsely implicated in the alleged ruckus with a friend of him who had happened to be a neighbor. 3. Learned counsel representing the State submitted the victim to have received 65 stitches and opposed the prayer for bail on the ground of severity. Page 2 of 3 4. The injury report, bed-head ticket, discharge certificate and other medical documents exhibited lacerated injury as well as fracture injury on the scalp in the temporal region. 5. Considering the nature and extent of the injury suffered by the victim, the period of detention presently undergone by the petitioner and the trial to have proceeded whereby three of the prosecution witnesses had already been examined, the petitioner is granted bail on the following conditions:- 6. The petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties and one is to be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat. The petitioner shall not enter the locale till completion of the trial and he shall furnish his new residential address to the Inspector-in- Charge, Ranaghat Police Station. The petitioner is to report to the Inspector-in-Charge, Ranaghat Police Station once in a week till the date of completion of trial. The petitioner shall not try to influence the investigation and the witnesses directly or indirectly and also shall not tamper with the evidence in any manner and he shall appear before the learned trial court on each and every date as fixed by the trial court. If he fails to comply with and/or adhere to the above conditions, the learned trial court is at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner in accordance with law. Page 3 of 3 7. The application being CRM(M) No.1004 of 2026 is, accordingly, disposed of. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance of all requisite formalities. 9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, J.)