17.08.2026 Sl.No. 47 Ct. 39 rejected (Susanta) In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRM (A) No. 2054 of 2026 In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Hasnabad Police Station Case No. 200 of 2026 dated 02.04.2026 under Sections 329(3)/326(g)/324(4)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to GR Case no. 1637 of 2026. -And- In the matter of : Acchiya Bibi @ Acchia Khatun … Petitioner Mr. Gazi Faruque, ….for the petitioner. Mr. Abhijit Singh, ……..for the State. 1. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and she has a minor child, therefore, he prays for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in any terms and conditions. 2. On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the State produced the Case Diary as well as Memo of Evidence and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. Let the Memo of Evidence be taken on record. 3. Having heard the submissions of the learned advocates for the respective parties and on perusal of the materials available on the case diary including the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNS of the victim as well as other neighbours, I am not inclined to 2 allow prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner as there are sufficient materials on record against the petitioner with an allegation that the petitioner and her husband burnt the entire house of the victim. 4. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. 5. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 6. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. )