2026:JHHC:7708 --1-- A.B.A. No. 7138 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7138 of 2025 ---- Deep Rowatiya @ Deep Routia, aged about 27 years, son of Soma Rowatiya, Temporary resident of Bherbheri, PO – Nepali Basti, PS – nishamari, District – Sonitpur, Assam (784506) and permanent resident of village – Gutjora, PO and PS – Khunti, District – Khunti, Jharkhand, 835210 .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Advocate ---- 05/19.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khunti P.S. Case No.132 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115(2), 316(2), 318(4), 322, 338, 336(3), 340(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khunti. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and false allegation is made against the petitioner of creating forged documents on the basis of wrong genealogy and pursuant to that the land has been transferred. He further submits that the petitioner has wrote a letter to the Director General of Police, Government of Jharkhand with regard to the land. In these backgrounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 2026:JHHC:7708 --2-- A.B.A. No. 7138 of 2025 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR and he has shown himself successor of Bhikam Singh and in connivance with other co-accused persons make a forged documents for grabbing the land of the informant and he has executed a power of attorney in favour of other co- accused persons and while he came to know about his indulgence in the alleged offence he wrote a letter to Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand stating therein that he has no concerned with the land and, therefore, the petitioner does not deserve the bail. 5. The petitioner is named in the FIR and he has shown himself as successor of Bhikham Singh and in connivance with other co-accused persons make a forged documents for grabbing the land of the informant and he has also executed the power of attorney in favour of other co- accused persons. Case diary has been received and the witnesses have supported the case of prosecution at paragraph Nos.4, 5 and 11 and allegations are there against the petitioner of creating the forged documents for transferring the land of the informant. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 13.03.2026 Sangam/