Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35038 (KAR)

SRI. NAGARAJU C D v. SMT SHILPA M

WP/8624/2023 · 2026-08-07

Chillakur Sumalatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010193862023 NC: 2026:KHC:41998 WP No. 8624 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 8624 OF 2023 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI. NAGARAJU C.D S/O DYAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT CHAMBALIKE DODDI, MULLAHALLI VILLAGE, VYAMBALLI HOBLI, KANAKAPURA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 119. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH K.H, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. SHILPA M D/O MALLESH W/O NAGARAJU C.D, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO. 149, 11TH CROSS, CHANDRA NAGAR, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 078. 2. PAVAN KUMAR N S/O NAGARAJU C D AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS 3. YASHAS D S/O NAGARAJU C D AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010193862023 NC: 2026:KHC:41998 WP No. 8624 of 2023 SINCE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE MINORS, REP. BY NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.1 SMT. SHILPA M ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 149, 11TH CROSS, CHANDRA NAGAR, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THIMMAIAH K.H, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ANNX-D THE SUSPENSION ORDER TO PETITIONER VIDE IN CRL.MISC. 138/2021 PASSED BY THE HONBLE VI ADL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT BANGALORE ON 28.12.2022 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010193862023 NC: 2026:KHC:41998 WP No. 8624 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Sri. Ramesh K.H learned counsel for the petitioner files memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. Sri.Thimmaiah K.H learned counsel for respondents is also present. Having gone through the contents of the memo filed, permission as prayed for is accorded. The writ petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7