CHARAKA DENTAL PRODUCTS v. The Commercial Tax Officer
/21137/2026 · 2026-06-12
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35034 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 35034 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP Nos. 21137 & 21161 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP Nos. 21137 & 21161 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.22875 & 22897 of 2026 In both WPs. Charaka Dental Products GSTIN - 33AAEFC3484C1ZV Represented by its Partner AP Senthil Kumar 12, Lakshmi Plaza Combines, Semi Basement Floor, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore - 641 018. ..Petitioner Vs The Commercial Tax Officer Avinashi Road Assessment Circle, Commercial tax building, Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 641018. ..Respondent PRAYER in W.P.No.21137 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Form GST DRC 07 bearing reference no. ZD330225161621S/2020-21 dated 17.2.2025 issued by the Sole Respondent and quash the same. PRAYER in W.P.No.21161 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Form GST DRC 07 bearing reference no. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Nos. 21137 & 21161 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ZD331225052147P/2021-22 dated 03.12.2025 issued by the Sole Respondent and quash the same. In both WPs. For Petitioner: Mr. S. Arvindh For Respondent: Mr. R. Sethu Prabakaran Government Counsel (Tax) COMMON ORDER Assessment orders are assailed in these two writ petitions on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Mr. R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing appeals has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment order. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment order, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned assessment orders are set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Nos. 21137 & 21161 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, fresh assessment orders shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 5.
The writ petitions are disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 12-06-2026 Index : Yes / No
Neutral Citation: Yes / No kj To The Commercial Tax Officer Avinashi Road Assessment Circle, Commercial tax building, Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 641018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP Nos. 21137 & 21161 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP Nos. 21137 & 21161 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.22875 & 22897 of 2026 12-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis