1 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.600 of 2026 Dated 19.06.2026 APHC010306422026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 600/2026 Between: PADALA VENKATA RAO, S/O LATE LATCHUMAYYA,AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, FARMERR/O ROMPIVALASA VILLAGE,ROMADALA POST, PATHAPATNAM MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 532214 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P.NELAPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. REDDI APARNA, W/O REDDI RAJU,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.OCCUPATION MPP AND BUSINESS WOMAN,R/O ROUTHULAXMIPURAM VILLAGE AND POST,ROMADALA POST, PATHAPATNAM MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 532213 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: VAMSI KRISHNA VARANASI Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.600 of 2026 Dated 19.06.2026 The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Criminal Revision Case is filed challenging the order dated 20.04.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1826 of 2025 in C.C.No.389 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Pathapatnam, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the typographical error in the complaint and other court records was dismissed. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. The impugned order dated 20.04.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1826 of 2025 in C.C.No.389 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Pathapatnam, is purely interlocutory in nature, inasmuch as the said order was passed declining to allow the petition filed by the petitioner seeking amendment of the typographical mistake made in the complaint and other Court records. In view of the bar contained under Section 397(2) of ‘the Cr.P.C.,’/Section 438(2) of ‘the BNSS’, and in view of the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam1, Bhaskar Industries Ltd. v. Bhiwani 1(2009) 5 SCC 153 3 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.600 of 2026 Dated 19.06.2026 Denim & Apparels Ltd.2, Girish Kumar Suneja v. CBI3 and Amar Nath v. State of Haryana4, the present Criminal Revision Case is not maintainable. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an appropriate application, in accordance with law, before the appropriate forum. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 19.06.2026 RSI 2(2001) 7 SCC 401 3(2017) 14 SCC 809 4(1977) 4 SCC 137 4 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.600 of 2026 Dated 19.06.2026 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 600 of 2026 Dated: 19.06.2026 RSI 124