Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 35014 (CHH)

LALMUNI YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2294/2026 · 2026-09-07

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010337422026 2026:CGHC:39288-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2294 of 2026 1 - Lalmuni Yadav W/o Upendra Yadav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Sulesa, Choki-Pandrapatha, Thana Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.). 2 - Dhananjay Yadav S/o Upendra Yadav, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Sulesa, Choki-Pandrapatha, Thana Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through S.H.O- Bagicha, District- Jashpur (C.G.). 2 - Sanjay Yadav S/o Satyanarayan Yadav R/o Village Sulesa, Thana Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav Advocate. For Respondent No. 1/State : Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy. A.G. DB: Hon'ble Shri Chief Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (08.09.2026) SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2026.09.09 10:11:33 +0530 2 1. Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy.A.G. for Respondent No. 1/State. 2.This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (CRMP) has been filed with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash FIR No. 158/2026 registered at Police Station Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.), under Sections 109(2), 296, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, qua the petitioners and pass such other and further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice”. 3.During the course of hearing, Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this petition seeking liberty to avail the remedy before the learned Trial Court at the appropriate stage. 4.Mr. Sumit Singh, Dy.A.G. for Respondent No.1/State does not have any objection to the same. 5.In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the petitioners, if so advised, may avail remedy before the learned Trial Court at the appropriate stage. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) (Krushna Ram Mohapatra) Judge Chief Justice H.L. Sahu / $ourabh