Item- A- 39. sg 17-08-2026 Ct. 6 CO 2411 of 2026 Binita Chakraborty Versus Gurupada Chakraborty Mr. Kaushik Choudhury …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the wife and is directed against an order being No. 6 dated 28th October, 2025 passed by the learned District Judge, Bankura in Matrimonial Suit 238 of 2017. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the marriage was dissolved by mutual consent under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. He further submits that the decree was not drawn up and the learned District Judge, Bankura, by the order impugned directed drawing up of the decree. He submits that in the meantime, the husband has passed away. It is not in dispute that the marriage was dissolved on mutual consent when the husband was alive. Drawing up of the decree is the ministerial job and the learned Judge, by the order impugned, only directed drawing up of the decree. In view of the above, this Court does not find any infirmity in the impugned order warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, this civil revisional application stands disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)