Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34991 (PAT)

Umakant Nirala and Ors v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./50486/2018 · 2026-02-04

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50486 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1620 Year-2012 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Umakant Nirala S/o Late Bishundeo Paswan, 2. Arjun Bhagat S/o Late Dewari Bhagat, 3. Ram Das Bhagat S/o Late Dewari Bhagat, 4. Munnilal Bhagat S/o Late Dewari Bhagat, 5. Ranjit Paswan S/o Arjun Bhagat, 6. Anil Paswan S/o Ram Ishwar Bhagat, 7. Manoj Kumar S/o Umakant Prasad Nirala, All are R/o Vill.- Yusufpur, Paswan Nagar, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Raj Kishore Manjhi S/o Late Bishun Deo Manjhi, R/o Vill.- Babhanaiya, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran, Chapra. Presently residing at 4/M-87 Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Patna-800026. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shravan Kumar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, Advocate Ms. Monika Singh, Advocate Ms. Muskan Singh, Advocate Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Reena Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 5 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This petition has been filed against the order dated 25.06.2018 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in Cr. Revision No. 50 of 2018 as well as the order dated 20.11.2017 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50486 of 2018(5) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 Magistrate-III, Vaishali at Hajipur in Complaint Case No. 1620 of 2012, whereby and whereunder the Court concerned has dismissed the Discharge petition filed on behalf of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case may be disposed. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners. 5. In view of the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, this case stands disposed of. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T