Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34963 (CAL)

KAMAL KRISHNA PARUA AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2526/2026 · 2026-08-17

Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

122 17.08.2026 Ct. No 551 Jayanta CRM (A) 2526 of 2026 Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. In the matter of : KAMAL KRISHNA PARUA AND ANR. ….. petitioners Adv. Amitabha Karmakar Adv. Anup Kr. Bhowmick …. For the Petitioners. Adv. Indradip Das Adv. Soumalya Dutta … for the State. 1. Parties are present through their learned Counsel. 2. Leaned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the instant anticipatory bail application. He seeks to not press the application. 3. In such circumstances, the instant application being CRM (A) 2526 of 2026 is stands dismissed as not pressed. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)