Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34959 (PAT)

Binod Kumar Pandey v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./61682/2018 · 2026-01-28

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61682 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== Binod Kumar Pandey S/o Parshuram Pandey, R/o Siddarthpuram Colony, Mahanandpur, Mughalsarai- 232101, P.S.- Mughalsarai-Kotwali Town, Uttar Pradesh. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Sunita Pandey W/o Binod Kumar Pandey, R/o Gajrad, Gali Number 10, Ward Number 4, Sasaram, P.S.- Thana -Model, Rohtas, Bihar- 821115. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chaubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 13.08.2018 passed by the learned A.C.J.M., Sasaram in S. Tr. No. 411 of 2018, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 20 of 2018 by which cognizance was taken against the petitioner under Section 498(A), 307 and 120(B) of the I.P.C. 3. As per the report dated 01.09.2025, submitted by the Court concerned, S.Tr. No. 411 of 2018, arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 20 of 2018 has been disposed of and the petitioner has already been acquitted on 24.02.2024. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61682 of 2018(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has already been acquitted and this case has become infructuous, accordingly, prays for disposal of this case. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties and report of the learned Trial Court, this case is disposed of having become infructuous. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T