Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3495 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1527/2026 · 2026-04-08

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19351 CRL.P No. 1527 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1527 OF 2026 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI W/O LATE SANNA MUDDAPPA C., AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/AT KUMARA NILAYA, 1ST MAIN ROAD, HANUMANTHPUR EXTENSION, TUMKUR TOWN AND DISTRICT-572133 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HASHMATH PASHA, SR.ADVOCATE A/W SRI. KARIAPPA N.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY TUMKUR TOWN POLICE STATION, TUMKURU 572101 (REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE 560 001 Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19351 CRL.P No. 1527 of 2026 2. SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O DEVARAJU, AGED 59 YEARS, R/O SHIDLAKATTE VILLAGE, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572214 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHANNAPPA EARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. S.K. SRINIVASAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING IN S.C.NO.113/2023 ON THE FILE OF HONBLE 2ND ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A,304B R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF D.P ACT WHICH IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.80/2022 OF TUMAKUR TOWN POLICE STATION AS PER ANNEXURE A,B,C AND G AS ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19351 CRL.P No. 1527 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Sri. S.K. Srinivasan, learned counsel undertakes to enter appearance for respondent No.2. Sri. Hashmath Pasha, learned Senior counsel after arguing the matter at length would seek leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and urge all the contentions before the concerned Court at the appropriate time. 2. It is needless to observe that the concerned Court would answer all the contentions advanced by the petitioner before the concerned Court at the appropriate time. 3. With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15