MD. SHAKIL ALLIAS MD SHAKIL AHMAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2265/2026 · 2026-03-24
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3495 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3495 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:8202
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2265 of 2026
Md. Shakil @ Md. Shakil Ahmad, aged about 54 years, S/o Late Md. Khurshid, R/o Road No. 2, Makdumpur, P.O. & P.S. Parsudih, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum (Jharkhand)
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Ms. Sushma Aind, Advocate
---
02/24th March 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No. 140 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 121/ 122/ 126(2)/ 127(2)/ 118(1)/ 118(2)/ 109(1)/ 329(3)/35 2/351(3) of B.N.S., now said to have been pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M., Jamshedpur.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2025. He has submitted that there is a case and counter-case between the parties and the victim has suffered grievous injury and so far as the allegation against the petitioner is concerned, there is no overt act, although he has been named in the FIR. He submits that except the main assailant, all other co-accused, who have been named in the FIR, have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 7216 of 2025 vide order dated 18.12.2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is named in the FIR but there is no overt Act, so far as the petitioner is concerned and other co-accused, who are similarly situated as that of the petitioner, have been granted anticipatory bail by
2026:JHHC:8202
2
this Court, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No. 140 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 24.03.2026
Uploaded On: 25.03.2026
Mukul/-