Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3494 (BOM)

PARVATADEVI APANG SHIKSHAN AND PRASHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THR ITS PRESIDENT SHANTARAM AND ANR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

WP/9264/2026 · 2026-08-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} wp9264-26.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.9264 OF 2026 Parvatadevi Apang Shikshan And Prashikshan Prasarak Mandal Through its President & Another PETITIONERS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Mr. Vijay B. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. S. R. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.] DATE : 17 th AUGUST, 2026 ORDER : Since the schedule fixed by the Government for approval of proposals for commencement of new subjects is over, we are not inclined to entertain the Writ Petition. We, therefore, dispose of the Writ Petition by granting liberty to the Petitioners, to apply afresh in the next academic year. [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/wp9264-26.doc 2026:BHC-AUG:36737-DB