Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34934 (PAT)

Rohit Kumar Tripathi v. B. Rajendra, Principal Secretary, General Administration

MJC/923/2025 · 2026-02-13

Partha Sarthy, Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.923 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17590 of 2023 ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Tripathi, S/o Vimal Kumar Tripathi, Resident of Quarter No.- B- 5/15, I.G.I.M.S Campus, Sheikhpura, P.S. - Shastri Nagar, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. B. Rajendra, Principal Secretary, General Administration Government of Bihar. 2. Parmar Ravi Manubhai, Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Patna. 3. Pradeep Kumar Malik, The Ld. Registrar General, Patna High Court. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State : AC to GA-11 For the B.P.S.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY) 3 13-02-2026 The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief :- “That this application is being filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the concerned Respondent who deliberately, intentionally and willingly disobeyed the order dated 07.02.2025 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar, Acting Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy in C.W.J.C Case No.17590 of 2023 wherein and whereby this Hon’ble Court was pleased to direct appointment of the Petitioner to the post of Civil Patna High Court MJC No.923 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 Judge-Junior Division. To date, the Petitioner has not been appointed which is in complete violation of the Order directing that the all the sequel Order and formalities be completed within a period of fortnight.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. 3. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. avinash/- (Partha Sarthy, J) (Rajiv Roy, J) U