Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34915 (MAD)

V.PERIYASAMY v. The Tahsildar

WP/18965/2026 · 2026-06-08

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 18965 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 18965 of 2026 V.Periyasamy S/o Velan, Eyyanur Village and Post, Kallakurichi Taluk and District ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Tahsildar Veppur Taluk, Veppur, Cuddalore District ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to transfer the patta in the name of the petitioner for the land in Survey No 93/13, situated at Sirunesalur village, Veppur Taluk Cuddalore District in pursuance to the petitioners online application No 2025/ N105/ 18/ 476609 dated 10.09.2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Munusamy For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Govt’s counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 10.09.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18965 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself. 4. Today, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation was already considered and disposed of vide order dated 13.11.2025. Since there was a dispute with regard to the extent of the property, the respondents are not in position to pass orders for issuance of patta, pertaining to the subject property in favour of the petitioner. Hence, he requests this Court to close this petition. 5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order passed by the respondents was not at all served to the petitioner till date. Hence, he requests this Court to pass orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18965 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 7. In view of the above, the respondent is directed to serve a copy of the order dated 13.11.2025 to the petitioner within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt of the said order, it is up to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. 8. With the about directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nsa To The Tahsildar Veppur Taluk, Veppur Cuddalore District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 18965 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 18965 of 2026 08-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis