Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34911 (MAD)

KAS Angadi v. State Tax Officer

WP/21029/2026 · 2026-06-12

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 21029 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 21029 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.22729 & 22731 of 2026 Tvl. KAS Angadi Represented by its Proprietor, Mr. Sinu K A, Near Rani Rani Hotel, No. 5, Chennai-Kumbakonam High Road, Anna Gramam, Gandhi Nagar Post, Neyveli, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore 607 308. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Tax Officer Panruti Rural, Tamilnadu. ..Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to order bearing Reference No. ZD331225091997X dated 06.12.2025, passed by the respondent and quash the same and to remand back to the respondent and direct the respondent to pass fresh orders in accordance with law. For Petitioner: Mr. C. Bosco For Respondent: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 06.12.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21029 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 12-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21029 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To State Tax Officer Panruti Rural, Tamilnadu. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 21029 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 21029 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.22729 & 22731 of 2026 12-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis