PARAMJEET SINGH THROUGH GPA PARMINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
INCOMP/1393/2026 · 2026-08-01
Archana Puri
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34907 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34907 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sr. No.110 INCOMP-1393-2026 Date of Decision: 01.08.2026 PARAMJEET SINGH THROUGH GPA PARMINDER SINGH ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI Present: None. ***** ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral) The present petition was filed in the year 2026 wherein, the objection was raised by the Registry. Thereafter, none had bothered to clear the said objection and the incomplete petition is still pending with the Registry of this Court. Thus, it has been listed before this Court for further orders. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the application on which some objection is raised by the Registry, the same is required to be taken back by the counsel/party, who filed it, to be re-filed within a total period of 40 days. However, the same was never taken back for the purposes of re-filing and thus, the case is listed before this Court for orders. Keeping in view the fact that none has come forward to clear the objection, raised by the Registry, so as to get the application listed, despite the fact that note was published in the cause list for the information of the respective counsel to clear the objection in the cases which are lying pending with the Registry, the petition calls for no further consideration and the same be consigned. Accordingly, the case stands disposed of.
(ARCHANA PURI) JUDGE 01.08.2026 Preeti S. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PREETI 2026.08.01 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document