Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 349 (CHH)

CHANDRAPRAKASH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRCA/482/2026 · 2026-03-31

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:15150 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRCA No. 482 of 2026 Chandraprakash S/o Shatruhan Prasad Aged About 33 Years R/o Ward No. 18, Bhatapara, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Baikunthpur, District- Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Shri Manoj Paranjpe, Sr. Advocate with Shri Arpan Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. Ritika Verma, PL. For objector : Shri Uttam Pandey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 01/04/2026 1. This first anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No.88/2026 registered at Police Station – Baikunthpur, GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.04.02 11:14:36 +0530 2 District- Koriya (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the complainant and accused/applicant met through a matrimonial site and started talking to each other and as per the prosecution story applicant convinced the victim that he would marry her and they began meeting each other and on 31.10.2025, applicant/accused came to the victim house in Baikunthpur and stayed for two days and made physical relation with the victim and physical relation between both continued until December 2025 and subsequently applicant refused to marry the victim/complainant. The FIR has been registered under section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the victim is a major girl aged about 31 years and she was having affair with the applicant and also established physical relationship and when the applicant’s marriage was fixed with some other girl, the present FIR has been lodged by the victim. It is further submitted that the applicant is a permanent resident of address mentioned in the cause title and there is no likelihood of absconding, the applicant undertakes to abide by any conditions imposed by this Court, therefore, he submits that the present applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail. 3 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel, appearing for the non - applicant/State, opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. 5. Learned counsel for the objector opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. He would submit that it is anticipated by the applicant that the marriage could not be solemnized due to horoscope of the applicant and the victim could not match but infact the victim was induced by the applicant and physical relationship was established, thereafter present FIR has been lodged as the applicant’s marriage was settled elsewhere. 6. Considering the facts & circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties, materials available on record, also perused the statement of the victim who is a major girl aged about 31 years under Section 183 BNSS, considering the fact that she came in contact with the applicant and they established consensual relationship and when the relationship could not materialize, present FIR has been lodged, considering the fact, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the present applicant. 7. Accordingly, the instant MCRCA is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant – Chandraprakash, on executing a personal bond and one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer, he shall be released on bail on the following conditions:- (a) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person 4 acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court. (b) The applicant shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial. (c) The applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court till disposal of the trial. (d) The applicant and the surety shall submit a copy of his adhaar card along with a coloured postcard full size photo having printed the adhaar number on it, which shall be verified by the trial Court. (e) The applicant shall not involve himself in any offence of similar nature in future. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri