Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34898 (KAR)

GEETHA NAYAK v. ABUSALI

MFA/6992/2024 · 2026-06-30

Lok Adalath

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL & SMT. ARCHANA K.M., MEMBER M.F.A.No. 6992/2024 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 8123/2025) BETWEEN 1 . GEETHA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O LATE KRISHNA NAYAK, 2 . JAYA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 3 . SHARADA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 4 . MANJESH NAYAK AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, APPELLANT NOS. 2 TO 4 ARE CHILDREN OF LATE KRISHNA NAYAK, ALL ARE R/AT 1-67, Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 HOSA MANE, CHIKKALBETTU, HIRGANA VILLAGE, KARKALA TALUK. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PAVANA CHANDRA SHETTY H , ADVOCATE) AND 1 . ABUSALI AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O SRI MOHAMAD KASHIM, R/AT KASIM MANZIL, DEPPUTTE DARKASU, MAME VILLAGE, KARAKALA TALUK 2 . THE BRANCH MANAGER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD., MOODABIDRI BRANCH, NITHYANANDA COMPLEX, NEAR BUS STAND, MOODABIDRI, MANGALORE TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY RAVISH BENNI, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA FILED U/S.173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.12.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO.382/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA UDUPI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.90,000/- (Rupees Ninety Thousand Only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellants / claimants, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER SRK