Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34892 (MAD)

Appusamy v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/14841/2026 · 2026-06-12

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 1.Appusamy 2.Nandhini 3.Kavinkumar ... Petitioners Vs. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, D-2 Anna Salai, Chennai District. (Crime No.121 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.121 of 2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Pandian For Respondent : Mr.N.Palanivel, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 ORDER The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.121 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner along with other accused have assaulted the de facto complainant and thereby caused injuries. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that they are ready to abide any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the grant of anticipatory bail and would submit that, there are about totally four accused in this case and the petitioners have 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 been arrayed as A2 to A4. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5. Taking into consideration of the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is of the firm view that, at this length of time, further custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.II, Egmore, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions: (a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 stand automatically cancelled; (b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity; (c) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks, and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; (e) If the petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 12.06.2026 cda 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 To 1.The Metropolitan Magistrate No.II, Egmore. 2.The Inspector of Police, D-2 Anna Salai, Chennai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. cda Crl.O.P.No.14841 of 2026 12.06.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis