NEERAJ KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.T CHANDIGARH AND OTEHRS
CRWP/9183/2026 · 2026-08-01
H S Grewal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34889 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34889 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9183-2026 1 106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9183-2026 Date of Decision: 01.08.2026 NEERAJ KUMAR AND ORS .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Petitioners in person. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)
1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for the issuance of directions to the official respondents to safeguard and protect the life and liberty of the petitioners, as the petitioners have left their homes and living here and there due to constant threat and pressure of private respondents, the police is not ready to hear the grievances of petitioners. Petitioners have made representation before Chandigarh Police on 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) and also apprised the police about the marriage of son of petitioners No. 1 and 2 with the daughter of private respondent No. 5 but they are still facing acute threat to their life and liberty and also maltreatment, harassment at the hands of private respondents. Due to which, the petitioners are not able to live in their own house and are running here and there taking shelters in order to protect their life, because there is clear threat to their lives at the hands of RENU RAWAT 2026.08.01 13.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
CRWP-9183-2026 2 the private respondents, who are running after their blood, hence the present petition in the interest of justice. 2. Petitioners in person contends that the petitioners have preferred a representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) to Senior Superintendent of Police, UT, Chandigarh but no action has been taken so far. It is further submitted that they would be satisfied if directions are issued to Senior Superintendent of Police, UT, Chandigarh to look into their representation and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents No. 1 to 2. 4. I have heard the petitioners and perused the record. 5.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police, UT, Chandigarh to consider and decide the representation representation dated 28.07.2026 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioners, in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass an appropriate order. (H.S.GREWAL) 01.08.2026
JUDGE renu Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RENU RAWAT 2026.08.01 13.27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh