SK ABDUL RAHAMAN @ ABDUR RAHMAN @ SK. ABDUL RAHAMAN @ ABDUR RAHAMAN AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/1948/2026 · 2026-08-17
Ajay Kumar Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34884 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34884 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17.08.2026 Sl.No. 13 Ct. 39 Allowed Amalranjan In The High Court At Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side
CRM (A) No. 1948 of 2026
In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of
the
Bharatiya
Nagarik
Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023/corresponding to under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; filed in connection with GR case no. 95/2026 arising out of Arambagh Police Station Case No. 39 of 2026 dated 30.01.2026 under Sections 109/126(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. -And- In the matter of : Sk. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman @ Sk. Abdul Rahaman @ Abdur Rahaman & Ors. … Petitioners Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh Mr. Souvik Dey ….for the petitioners Mr. Brajesh Jha Ms. Hasi Saha ……..for the State
1. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent. They have been falsely implicated in this case. He prays for anticipatory bail in any terms and conditions. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case diary and also refers the statement under Section 180 of the BNSS including the injury report. 3. Having heard the learned counsels for the respective parties and on perusal of the materials available on
record as well as the case diary, including the statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, and injury report, though the allegation was made in the FIR that victim was assaulted by iron rod, whereas in the injury report it appears that they assaulted by brick. 4. Considering the aforesaid facts and nature of injury, this court finds that this is a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners as there is no need for custodial interrogation/detention. 5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners, namely, 1) Sk. Abdul Rahman @ Abdur Rahman @ Sk. Abdul Rahaman @ Abdur Rahaman, 2) Sk. Nurangir, 3) Sk. Samim @ Sk. Samim Uddin, 4) Sk. Samnirul Islam @ Choto kochi @ Sk., 5) Sk. Rakib Hossain @ Sk. Rakib @ Sk. Rafik Hossain and 6) Sk. Safik Alam @ Sk. Safi Alam @ Sk. Mafija are allowed. 6.
In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the arresting officer on the terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. corresponding to Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. In the event the petitioners fail to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above, the prosecution shall be at liberty to pray for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted by this Court in accordance with law. 2
8. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. 9. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. 10. Concerned Department is directed to supply certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Ajay Kumar Gupta, J. ) 3