Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3488 (KAR)

GOPINATH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/516/2026 · 2026-04-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20173 CRL.P No. 516 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 516 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. GOPINATH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA, R/A NO.946, NANDI ROAD CHIKKABALLAPURA, KARNATAKA - 562 101 2. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, S/O K. NARAYANASWAMAPPA R/A NO.946, NANDI ROAD CHIKKABALLAPURA, KARNATAKA - 562 101 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUDHINDRA S.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VYALIKAVAL POLICE, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. CHANDRAKANTH P.D. S/O P. DODDAPPA GOWDA Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20173 CRL.P No. 516 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS DIRECTOR OF BRICASA DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRT. LIMITED, NO.40/1, 14TH CROSS, BEHIND RAJESH HOTEL, VYALIKAVAL, BENGALURU …RESPONDENTS (BY MS. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1 SRI. K. CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 SMT. HAHNAVI H.K., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.22595/2019 IN CRIME NO.105/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 8TH ADDL. CMM COURT, NRUPATUNGA ROAD BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 506, 34, 504, 406 AND 420 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20173 CRL.P No. 516 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER This Court, on 02.03.2026 had passed the following order: "Sri. K. Chandranath Ariga, learned counsel submits that he has entered appearance for respondent No.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner shall secure instructions as to when the amount of Rs.10,00,000/- that forms the fulcrum of the lis would be paid back to the respondent No.2/complainant, as there is hoodwinking by the petitioner of the said Rs.10,00,000/-. List the matter on 13.03.2026." 2. The petition was entertained and Rs.10.00 lakhs was directed to be paid. 3. On 13.03.2026, the following order was passed: "This Court on 02.03.2026 had passed the following order: "Sri. K. Chandranath Ariga, learned counsel submits that he has entered appearance for respondent No.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner shall secure instructions as to when the amount of Rs.10,00,000/- that forms the fulcrum of the lis would be paid back to the respondent No.2/complainant, as - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20173 CRL.P No. 516 of 2026 there is hoodwinking by the petitioner of the said Rs.10,00,000/-. List the matter on 13.03.2026." Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the amount of Rs.10,00,000/- is not paid. List this matter on 23.03.2026 in the 'fresh matters list' awaiting appearance of the petitioners. The petition would be dismissed in the event the order would not be complied on the next date of hearing." 4. Even today, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that no amount is paid. 5. Owing to the default on the part of the petitioners, the petition stands rejected. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7