Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34876 (KAR)

SMT.SADAMMA v. SMT.SHAIK AKTHAR BEGAM

MFA/565/2025 · 2026-07-11

Lok Adalath

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI & SRI VIJAYKUMAR MAJAGE, MEMBER M.F.A.no.565/2025 (MV-D) (Lok Adalat No.2590/2026) BETWEEN: 1 . SMT.SADAMMA W/O ANGADI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS 2 . ANGADI KRISHNAPPA S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS 3 . MUNILAKSHMAMMA D/O ANGADI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 4 . NETHRAMAM D/O ANGADI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT BHOOMI SETTHALLI VILALGE CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563 123. Digitally signed by SHASHIREKHA K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA 2 5 . RAMANJANEYA N K S/O ANGADI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT HUNASENAHALLI VILLAGE TIPPENAGHALLI CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563 125. 6 . N K MANJUNATHA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 36YEARS 7 . NARASIMHAPPA N K S/O ANGADI KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS APPELLANT NO.1 TO 3, 6 & 7 ARE R/AT NAYANAHALLI VILLAGE KONPALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563 125. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI G.M.SRINIVASA REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . SMT.SHAIK AKTHAR BEGAM W/O SHIAK MOHAMMED SALEEM AGED MAJOR R.AT NO 43/149, BOSENAGAR RAYACHOOTI, YSR KADAPA ANDHRAPRADESH - 5162699 OWNER OF THE MAHINDRA SCORPIO BEARING REG NO AP 04 -S-1818. 2 . THE MANAGER THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., TP CLAIMS HUB, NO.9/2, 2ND FLOOR, MAHALAKSHMI CHAMBERS MG ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001 3 POLICY NO 61120913120100001219 VALIDITY 13-08-2022 TO 12-08-2023 …… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH KAMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 11.03.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.7062/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE JUDGE, SMALL CAUSE, ACMM, MACT, BENGALURU SCCH-9, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. CONCILIATION ORDER Learned Counsel appearing for Appellants - Claimants is present. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent no.2 – New India Assurance Company Limited along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, matter is settled. A joint memo signed by learned advocate appearing for appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and learned advocate appearing for respondent no.2 - New India Assurance Company Limited and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants have agreed to receive and the respondent no.2 - New India Assurance Company Limited has 4 agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.2,15,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fifteen thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent no.2 - New India Assurance Company Limited has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which, the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The apportionment, deposit and release of enhanced compensation amount shall be made in terms of Judgment and Award passed by Claims Tribunal. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER YKL