Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34870 (CAL)

JAMIR ALI KAYAL @ JAMIRUL KAYAL v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/138/2026 · 2026-08-12

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12.08.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.2 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc. C.R.M. (M) 138 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed in connection with Barasat Police Station Case No. 53 of 2023 dated 23.01.2023 under Section 376(AB) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Jamir Ali Kayal alias Jamirul Kayal ... Petitioner. Ms. Anubrata Dutta … For the Petitioner. Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder, Ld. AAG, Mr. Kallol Mondal, Ld. PP, Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Ld. APP, Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Mr. Bikash Kumar Singh ... For the State. Let the matter be detagged. Report in respect of Barasat Police Station Case No. 53 of 2023 dated 23.01.2023 has been submitted by the Superintendent of Police, Barasat Police District. Let the same be kept with the record. The said report reflects that eight more witnesses are required to conclude the trial. On last two schedules, the witnesses could not be examined as the Presiding Officer was engaged in training. Having considered that the Superintendent of Police is monitoring the progress of the trial, no further orders are being passed for the present. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 138 of 2026 is deemed to be disposed of. 2 All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)