Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34866 (PAT)

Sikandar Chauhan v. State Of Bihar and Anr

CR. MISC./56947/2018 · 2026-02-12

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56947 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3211 Year-2013 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Sikandar Chauhan S/o Gharbharan Chauhan, R/o Vill.- Magahia Tola, Bishunpura, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. State Of Bihar 2. Rajpati Devi W/o Sikandar Chauhan, D/o Ramjatan Mahto, R/o Vill.- Khampar, P.S.- Khampar, District - Deoria U.P.. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the order 12.04.2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gopalganj in A.B.P. No. 549 of 2018 to the extent of the condition fixed by the learned Court below under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Complaint Case No. 3211 of 2013 (Tr. No. 1310 of 2018) for the offence under Section 498A of the I.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case may be disposed of. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has no objection to this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56947 of 2018(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 prayer of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, the present case is disposed of. rakhi/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T