Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34857 (CAL)

N ANJAMMAL v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER

WPA/395/2026 · 2026-08-06

Rajasekhar Mantha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/395/2026 N. Anjammal Vs. The Superintending Engineer and another Mr. U. Partha Sarathi … for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Mishra … for the respondents August 06, 2026 [SR] Item No. 5 1. The petitioner submits that the application for electricity connection has not been considered by the respondent authorities. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents Mr.S.C.Mishra submits that the application shall be considered in according the rules. 3. In that view of the matter, it is directed that the application of the petitioner is processed within a period of three weeks from date and appropriate communication is made to the petitioner. 4. With the aforesaid observations, WPA/395/2026 stands disposed of without any order as to costs. 5. All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. ( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )