Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3485 (AP)

SAGI APPALANARASIMHA RAJU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15574/2026 · 2026-06-28

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders: Nil Date of pronouncement: 29.06.2026 Date of uploading: APHC010296322026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15574/2026 Between: 1. SAGI APPALANARASIMHA RAJU, S/O KRISHNAMURTHY RAJU SAGI, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS R/O KANCHERU VILLAGE, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, 53001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH 522237 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH PPLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH 522503 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 535001 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHOGAPURAM POLICE STATION, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 535216 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order 2 or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of a Writ of. Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents particularly the 3rd Respondent and 4th Respondent in interfering in civil disputes between private persons, calling the Petitioners to Police Station and trying to disposes the Petitioners from their lands in Kancheru Village of Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District to an extent of Acres.6.55 Cents in Sy.No.270-1, to an extent of Acres. 1.97 Cents in Sy.No. 271-1 and to an extent of Acres 1.61 Cents in Sy.No.271-3, Total extent Acres.10.13 Cents as illegal arbitrary and violative of article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent and 4th Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes between private persons, not to call the Petitioners to Police Station and not to disposes the Petitioners from subject lands and/or pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent and 4th Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes between private persons, not to call the Petitioners to Police Station and not to disposes the Petitioners from their lands in Kancheru Village of Bhogapuram Mandal Vizianagaram District to an extent of Acres.6.55 Cents in Sy.No.270-1 to an extent of Acres. 1.97 Cents in Sy.No. 271-1 and to an extent of Acres 1.61 Cents in Sy.No.271-3, Total extent : Acres. 10.13 Cents and/or pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N BHARATH SIMHA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15574 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Instant Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents particularly the 3rd Respondent and 4th Respondent in interfering in civil disputes between private persons, calling the Petitioners to Police Station and trying to disposes the Petitioners from their lands in Kancheru Village of Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District to an extent of Acres.6.55 Cents in Sy.No.270-1, to an extent of Acres. 1.97 Cents in Sy.No. 271-1 and to an extent of Acres 1.61 Cents in Sy.No.271- 3, Total extent Acres.10.13 Cents as illegal arbitrary and violative of article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent and 4th Respondent not to interfere in civil disputes between private persons, not to call the Petitioners to Police Station and not to disposes the Petitioners from subject lands and pass such other order or orders …”. 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader reported no objection for the same. 4. Permission is accorded. 4 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 29.06.2026 PSA Whether the Order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15574 of 2026 Date: 29.06.2026 PSA