Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34846 (CAL)

K MALAI KANNU v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER

WPA/384/2026 · 2026-08-04

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR] *** WPA/384/2026 K. Malai Kannu Vs. The Superintending Engineer and Another Mr. U. Partha Sarthi … for the petitioner Mr. S.C.Mishra … for the respondents August 4, 2026 [AKB] Item No. 12 1. Parties are represented through their respective learned counsel. 2. This Court disposes of the instant writ petition directing the respondent No.2 authority to dispose of the representation dated 17.12.2025 as submitted by the writ petitioner in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the writ petitioner and thereafter shall pass a reasoned order and shall forthwith communicate the same to the writ petition. 3. The entire exercise as indicated in the forgoing paragraph is to be completed by the respondent No.2 authority within 30 (thirty) working days from the date of communication of the server copy of this order by the learned advocate on record for the writ petitioner. 4. With the aforementioned observation WPA/384/2026 is disposed of. 5. Before parting with it is made clear the while disposing the instant writ petition this Court has not gone into the merits 2 of the representation dated 17.12.2025 as submitted by the writ petitioner and thus all points are kept open for adjudication by the respondent No. 2 authority. ( Partha Sarathi Sen, J. )