1 CGHC010344112026 2026:CGHC:39266-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4583 of 2026 Anurag Hore S/o Jayadeep Hore Aged About 19 Years R/o H. No. 12/864, Kumhar Para, Raman Mandir Ward 21, Pili Building Gali, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Union Of India Through Secretary Department Of Higher Education Ministry Of Education Govt. Of India, 127-C Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi 2 - National Testing Agency Through Director General First Floor, N.S.I.C. M.D.B.P. Building Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi 3 - National Medical Commission Through Chairperson, National Medical Commission, Pocket-14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1, New Delhi 4 - Medical Counselling Committee Through Directorate General Of Health Services, Room Number 354, D.G.H.S. Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, Delhi 5 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary/ Principal Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare And Medical Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 492002 6 - Commissioner Commissionerate Of Medical Education, 2nd Floor, North Block, Sector 19, Swasthya Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 7 - Director Medical Education, North Block, Sector-19, Swasthya Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 492002 8 - Chairman Counseling Committee, Directorate Of Medical Education, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VED PRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2026.09.08 15:39:34 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Akash Kundu, Advocate For Respondent No.2/NTA : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate For Respondents No. 5 to 8/State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, G.A. Hon'ble S hri Parth Prateem Sahu , Judge Hon'ble Shri R avindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge 07/09/2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the respondent No.2 has supplied the scanned OMR mark- sheet, and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Judge ved