JASWINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/9121/2026 · 2026-07-31
Virinder Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34837 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 34837 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-9121-2026 1 114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-9121-2026 Date of Decision: 31.07.2026 JASWINDER KAURAND ANOTHER ......... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present : None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
1. No one has appeared as lawyers have suspended the work today.
2. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of directions to respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to ensure protection of the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 and not to interfere in the peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioners.
3. The petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage on 27.07.2026.Copy of marriage certificate is (Annexure P-3). It is stated that petitioner No.1 was previously married and has since obtained a divorce from her earlier marriage. Copy of decree of divorce is Annexure P-6. Ever since then, the petitioners are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 27.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) was also made to respondent No. 2- Superintendent of Police, District Fatehabad, Haryana, SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.31 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-9121-2026 2 for protection of their lives and liberty.
4. In view of this, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 2- Superintendent of Police, District Fatehabad, Haryana to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
6. Pending misc. application (s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) JUDGE 31.07.2026 S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.31 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document