Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34834 (CHH)

SURESH KUMAR JAGATRAMKA v. MAHESH KUMAR JAGATRAMKA

MCC/828/2026 · 2026-09-07

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010342592026 2026:CGHC:39274 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 828 of 2026 • Suresh Kumar Jagatramka S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Jagatramka Aged About 64 Years R/o Gandhi Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.),...(Plaintiff) ... Applicant(s) versus 1. Mahesh Kumar Jagatramka S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Jagatramka Aged About 72 Years R/o Kolkata At Prsent R/o Station Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.),...(Defendants) 2. Smt. Pushpa Saraf W/o Prem Kumar Saraf Aged About 29 Years R/o - 3/a Siddheswari Road Kolkata -29, At Present R/o Station Chowk, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 3. Pradip Kejriwal S/o Late Manohar Lal Kejriwal Aged About 55 Years R/o 19-B James Long Sarani Kolkata - 38, At Present Subhash Chowk Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 4. Spectrum Infonent Pvt. Ltd. Director Bharat Agrawal S/o Vijay Agrawal, Aged About 40 Years R/o Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 5. Indrapal Singh Bhatiya S/o Hervansh Singh Bhatiya Business - Vyapar R/o Jagatpur Raigarh, Tehsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 6. Sunil Agrawal S/o Ramdas Agrawal Business - Vyapar, R/o Friends Colony Raigarh Tehsila And District Raigarh 7. Ponamchand Agrawal S/o Late Lalchand Agrawal Business - Vyapar, R/o Gandhi Ganj, Raigarh Tehsil And District Raigarh (C.G.) 8. State Of Chhattisgarh By The District Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar Jagatramka, For State : Ms. Laxmin Kashyap, Panel Lawyer MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.09.08 17:16:56 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 08.09.2026 1. Today the case is listed on office reference for extension of time to the trial Court. 2. PUD has been received from the Court of 3rd District Judge, Raigarh (C.G.) with a request for extension of time to decide Civil Suit No. A- 8/2021 (Suresh Kumar Jagatramka Vs. Mahesh Kumar), wherein it has been directed to decide the same upto 25.02.2025. 3. This Court vide order dated 27.03.2025 passed in MCC No. 300 of 2025 has already granted further four months time to the trial Court to conclude the trial. Thereafter, this Court vide order dated 30.07.2025 passed in MCC No. 760 of 2025 has also granted further six months time to the trial Court to conclude the trial and the trial Court has again sought time for the same with a reason that the case has not decided on stipulated time. 4. Though the six months have already been lapsed and the matter is listed before this Court, I feel inclined to allow the prayer made in the PUD. Prayer is allowed and extension of time is granted. Further four months time is granted to the trial Court for deciding the aforesaid civil suit. The time given shall start from today. 5. It is directed that whatever the application shall be filed by the parties, the trial Court will make endeavor to dispose of the same within a period of 4-5 days and will try to conclude the trial as per the extension period given by this Court. 6. In view of the above, the instant MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish