- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010078612026 NC: 2026:KHC:43102 CA No. 29 of 2026 In COP No.214 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2026 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.214 OF 2012 BETWEEN: SRI. VIKRANT PATKAR, S/O. SRI. V.D.PATKAR, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT BEACHWOOD TOWERS, YARI ROAD, ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400061. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. JAYARAMA B.L., ADVOCATE) AND: THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. KINGFISHER AIRLINES LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), ATTACHED TO HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, MAHATHMA GANDHI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.S.MAHADEVAN, ADVOCATE FOR OL) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 177 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959, READ WITH SECTION 5 OF THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010078612026 NC: 2026:KHC:43102 CA No. 29 of 2026 In COP No.214 of 2012 THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri. Jayarama B. L., counsel for the applicant, and Sri. K. S. Mahadevan, counsel for the respondent, appeared in person. 2. The application is filed seeking the following relief: a) Condone the delay of 2335 days in preferring the claim Form No.67 affidavit before the Official Liquidator and direct the Official Liquidator to adjudicate the claim made by the Applicant. and b) Pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 3. Counsel for the respective parties advanced several contentions. The applicant's counsel states that the application is filed to excuse a delay of 2335 days in submitting the proof of claim to the Official Liquidator. He argues that this delay can be excused and requests that the application be granted. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010078612026 NC: 2026:KHC:43102 CA No. 29 of 2026 In COP No.214 of 2012 The counsel for the Official Liquidator states that the office of the Official Liquidator has no objection to approving the application subject to Rule 178 and 179 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the respective parties is placed on record. The application papers were perused. 5. Being satisfied with the cause stated in the application, the delay in submitting the proof of claim to the Official Liquidator is excused, subject to Rules 178 and 179 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. The Official Liquidator is directed to adjudicate the applicant's claim in accordance with Rules 178 and 179 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. 6. Accordingly, C.A.No.29/2026 is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20