Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3483 (ALL)

NEERAJ v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/15237/2026 · 2026-05-05

Krishan Pahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15237 of 2026 Court No. - 65 (Sr. No.19 out of 259) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Alok Ranjan Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Jai Kishan Chaurasia, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.05 of 2026, under Sections 64(1), 333 BNS, 2023, Police Station Baraur, District Kanpur Dehat, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR is delayed by about 8 days, and there is no explanation for the said delay. The victim is a consenting party, as is evident from her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, wherein she has alleged fear that the applicant might discontinue the relationship as he is likely to marry. The victim is a married lady, obviously she is major. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 28.01.2026. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application but could not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Ranjan Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Neeraj .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) consideration the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 B.N.S.S., which indicates her consent, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Neeraj, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. May 6, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 15237 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad