Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34821 (CHH)

GIRVAR LAL SAGARVANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3579/2026 · 2026-09-06

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010242052026 2026:CGHC:39165 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3579 of 2026 1 - Girvar Lal Sagarvanshi S/o Late Thanwar Singh Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 2 - Khorbahara Ram S/o S/o Jagnuram Aged About 69 Years All R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 3 - Vishram Banjare S/o Lakhan Lal Banjare Aged About 56 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 4 - Lalit Sagarvanshi S/o Girvar Lal Sagarvanshi Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 5 - Hemprakash Banjare S/o Vishram Banjare Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 6 - Hemant Banjare S/o Vishram Banjare Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 7 - Lakhan Singh S/o Girvar Lal Sagarvanshi Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 8 - Mukesh Kumar Gendre S/o Khorbahara Gendre Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. 9 - Subhash Gendre S/o Khorbara Gendre Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kutelabhata Tehsil And District Durg C.G. ... Petitioner(s) Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector Durg District Durg C.G. 3 - Tahsildar Durg District Durg C.G. 4 - Additional Tahsidar Durg District Durg C.G. ---Respondents (Cause title taken from CIS System) For Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Thakre, Advocate For Respondents/State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07.09.2026 1. Heard on I.A. No. 02/2026, which is an application for withdrawal of the writ petition. 2. Upon due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh and duly constituted petition, if exigency so arises. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL