Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34819 (PNJ)

TILAK RAJ @ MUKHA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CRM-M/42158/2026 · 2026-07-31

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRM-M-42158-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 126 CRM-M-42158-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.07.2026 TILAK RAJ @ MUKHA ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. No one has appeared as lawyers have suspended the work today. 2. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS/Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.1 to 3 for conducting fair and impartial inquiry in incident dated 11.05.2025 vide which respondents No.4 to 9 has attacked the petitioner and caused injuries on his person and further directions to taken appropriate action on the basis of MLR of even date and to decide the representation dated 18.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) in a time bound manner. 3. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural to decide the complaint dated 18.07.2026 (Annexure P-2) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 5. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 6. Petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 31.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.31 14:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document