- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010005342018 NC: 2026:KHC:44373 WP No. 12832 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 12832 OF 2018 (LA-KHB) BETWEEN: 1. M. EREGOWDA S/O LATE SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O MADARHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKARSHINAKERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571428 2. P S YASHODHAMMA W/O M EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O MADARHALLI VILLAGE, CHIKKARSHINAKERE HOBLI MADDUR TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT-571428 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT OF REVENUE M S BUILDING BANGALORE-560 001 2. THE COMMISSIONER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD CAUVERY BHAVAN BANGALORE-560 009 Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010005342018 NC: 2026:KHC:44373 WP No. 12832 of 2018 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD CAUVERY BHAVAN BANGALORE-560 009 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKAR, AGA FOR R1; SRI.H.L.PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE R2 AND R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND QUASH THE FINAL NOTIFICATION NO.KAM.E.24 ACQ/2015 DATED 04.08.2015 AND PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 13.08.2015 BY COMMISSIONERS OF KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, BENGALURU UNDER ANNEXURE-J AND THE PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION NO.KHB.ACQ MANDYA/12/2013-14 DATED 18.12.2013 AND PUBLISHED IN KARNATAKA GAZETTE DATED 16.01.2014 BY COMMISSIONER OF KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, BENGALURU UNDER ANNEXURE-H IN RESPECT OF LANDS OF THESE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 to dismiss the writ petition, as the petitioners agreed to receive developed land in lieu of monetary - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010005342018 NC: 2026:KHC:44373 WP No. 12832 of 2018 compensation. This is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. In view of the above, nothing survives for consideration of this petition, Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0