IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.10 of 2022 ====================================================== Gouri Mandal, S/o Late Gulab Mandal, R/o Village - Sarmaspur near Kali Hanuman Temple (Tahbalpur) P.S. Lodipur, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Nanda Devi W/o Loknath Prasad, Resident of Village - Sarmaspur near Kali Hanuman Temple (Tahbalpur) P.S. Lodipur, District - Bhagalpur. 2. Loknath Prasad, S/o Late Gulab Mandal, Resident of Village - Sarmaspur near Kali Hanuman Temple (Tahbalpur) P.S. Lodipur, District - Bhagalpur. 3. Shankar Mandal s/o Late Gulab Mandal, R/o Village Sarmaspur near Kali Hanuman Temple (Tahbalpur), P.s. Lodipur, District Bhagalpur. 4. Shantosh Mandal, S/o Late Gulab Mandal, R/o Village Sarmaspur near Kali Hanuman Temple (Tahbalpur), P.s. Lodipur, District Bhagalpur. 5. Purandeo Singh, S/o Late Gulab Mandal, R/o Village Sarmaspur near Kali Hanuman Temple (Tahbalpur), P.s. Lodipur, District Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anupa Nand Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Fazle Karim, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 17 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that learned Sub Judge VIII, Bhagalpur in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 29 of 2019 has allowed the said appeal vide order dated 12.01.2022 after setting aside the order dated 11.05.2017 passed in Title Suit No. 890 of 2013 without any cost upon the Opposite Party. 3. On perusal of materials available on record and Patna High Court C.R. No.10 of 2022(17) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 mutual consent of both the parties, the present Civil Revision application is disposed of with subject to the condition that Opposite Party shall deposit the cost of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) within a period of four weeks from the copy of receipt of this order before the concerned Court and the said cost amount be given to petitioner/respondent. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 12.01.2022 is affirmed and modified to the extent that the Opposite Party will bear the aforesaid cost. Mayank/- (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U