18 Regular IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR SWP 2269/2013 c/w i)CPSW 650/2016 ii)CCP(S) 292/2023 NAYEEMA AKHTER ….. Petitioner(s) Through: None. V/s STATE OF JK AND OTHERS ….. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Z A Qureshi, Sr. Advocate. with Mr. Attar, Advocate. Mr. T A Lone, Dy. AG Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal, Judge ORDER 01.10.2026 SWP No. 2269/2013: 1. Ever since 03rd May 2023, none has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner in SWP No. 2269/2013. 2. In view of this, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. CPSW No. 650/2016 & CCP(S) No. 292/2023: 3. In CCP No. 292/2023, the petitioner reports non-compliance of order dated 02.07.2015, whereby the official respondents were directed to issue appointment order in favour of impleaded respondent i.e, petitioner herein in accordance with law. There is P a g e | 2 SWP 2269/2013 c/w i)CPSW 650/2016 ii)CCP(S) 292/2023 subsequent development in the shape of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in case titled Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Saba Wani wherein certain directions have been issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court to be complied by the official respondents within a period of eight weeks. 4. In view of the above, both the contempt petitions are disposed of by considering the claim of the petitioner in light of the order dated 02.07.2015 passed by this Court and also by the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case titled Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Saba Wani. (Rajnesh Oswal) Judge SRINAGAR 01.10.2026 Aasif