1 CGHC010343732026 2026:CGHC:39256 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 1152 of 2026 • Satish Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Gajanand Agrawal, Aged About 56 Years R/o Near Vardhman Dharamshala, In Front Of Vardhman Kirana Shop, Gowlipara, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. Smt. Seema Gidodiya W/o Adarsh Gidodiya Aged About 38 Years R/o Mukund Jewellers, Sarafa Market, Main Road, Dhule, Tehsil And District Dhule, Maharashtra. 2. Smt. Sheetal Choudhary W/o Ashish Choudhary Aged About 36 Years R/o Vaman Nagar Khamgaon Tehsil Shegaon District Akola, Maharashtra. 3. Smt. Kiran Agrawal W/o Narsingh Agrawal Aged About 68 Years R/o Gowlipara, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.). 4. Prahlad Agrawal S/o Late Narsingh Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Gowlipara, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg (C.G.). 5. Smt. Sahnaz Bano W/o Zabbar Dagli Aged About 48 Years R/o- C / 50, Sector A, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G.). 6. Mohammed Saleem Bhai Nirvaan S/o Mohammed Ramzan Nirvaan Aged About 49 Years R/o Ganjpara, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, (C.G.). 7. Sudarshan Kumar Gupta S/o Vishwanath Prasad Gupta Aged About 47 Years R/o Somni, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 8. Mohammed Mahtab Malik S/o Mohammed Shami Ahmed Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Tedesara, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 9. Smt. Rabia Kaushar W/o Mohammed Saleem Nirvan Aged About 44 Years R/o Ganjpara, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, C.G. 10. Smt. Anju Gupta W/o Sudarshan Kumar Gupta Aged About 43 Years R/o Somni, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). 11. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Respondents DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 For Petitioner : Mr. T. K. Tiwari, Advocate. For State/Respondent No.11 : Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Deputy G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 07/09/2026 1. Heard. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the remedy available under the law and to file an application for certified copy of the amended plaint. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection with regard to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of above submission made by the parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Deepti Jha