Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34784 (CHH)

SWATI KUMARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4100/2021 · 2026-09-02

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010264792021 2026:CGHC:39098 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4100 of 2021 Swati Kumari, W/o Chandan Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, Caste - Dusadh, R/o Vill- Paltu, Post Makhadumpur, District - Jahanabad, Bihar, Present R/o Q. No. 18A PP-Yad Colony, BMY Charoda Bhilai, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahandi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2 - The Regional Manager (Retail), Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Raipur Divisional Office, Indian Oil Bhavan, Rajiv Gandhi Marg (V.I.P. Road), P.O. Ravigram, Telibandha, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 3 - The Collector, - Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 4 - National Highways Authority Of India (Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Govt. Of India), Office Of Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, Bilaspur, D-61, HIG-1, Abhilasha Parisar, Behind Hitech Bus Stand - Tifra, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 5 - Office of the Executive Engineer, Public Works Department National Highway, Division Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, ... Respondents GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2026.09.07 19:26:28 +0530 2 For Petitioner : None. For State/respondents No.1, 3 & 5 : Shri Atanu Ghosh, Dy.G.A. For respondent No.2 : Shri Anand Shukla, Advocate. For respondent No.4 : Shri Dhiraj Kumar Wankhede, Advocate. SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 03/09/2026 1. Earlier the case was listed on 12/05/2026, 15/06/2026 and 18/08/2026, on all the three dates, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. 2. In the above facts of the case, it appears that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this writ petition and therefore this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge gouri