Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 34780 (PNJ)

NARINDER SINGH GHAI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/21444/2026 · 2026-07-23

Deepinder Singh Nalwa, Suvir Sehgal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-21444-2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (122) CWP-21444-2026 (O&M) Date of decision:- 23.07.2026 Narinder Singh ... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA Present:- Mr. Esh Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Bikramjit Singh for the petitioner. Ms. Anu Chatrath, Senior Advocate, Senior Additional A.G., Punjab with Mr. Ratik Chatrath Kapur, Advocate for the respondents. **** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) CM-12217-CWP-2026 1. Application is allowed, as prayed for. 2. Annexure P-4/A is taken on record. CWP-21444-2026 3. At the outset, Ms. Anu Chatrath, Senior Advocate/Senior Addl. A.G., Punjab, and Mr. Ratik Chatrath Kapur, Advocate state that the property, which is the subject matter of the present petition, whether or not any interim order has been passed by this Court, shall not be auctioned till the time a final decision is taken by the Improvement Trust. They state that, insofar as the orders of cancelling the plot of petitioner is concerned, it has been decided to KAMAL SHARMA 2026.07.31 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh. CWP-21444-2026 (O&M) -2- withdraw the cancellation order and a formal order to that effect shall be passed within one week from today. Competent Authority shall reconsider the grievance of petitioner, after affording him with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and considering the written submissions, if any, submitted by him. Thereafter, a detailed order shall be passed by the Director/Secretary of the Department of Local Bodies, Government of Punjab, within a period of four weeks. They further submitted that since heavy litigations has been generated, this procedure is being adopted in all similar cases. 4. Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the submissions made by learned Senior Counsel, present petition may be disposed of. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in above terms. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE ( DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA ) JUDGE 23.07.2026 Kamal Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No KAMAL SHARMA 2026.07.31 13:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Sector-1, Chandigarh.